by Casey Sack, Esq.
Rudolph Friedmann LLP
The at-will employment doctrine is a double-edged sword in the workplace, offering both freedom and uncertainty. It gives employees the flexibility to walk away from a job without strings attached, while employers can make staffing changes swiftly without protracted legal complications. Yet, with this freedom comes a shadow of unpredictability—where job security can feel fragile, and a slight shift in business priorities could lead to sudden dismissal. While the doctrine may appear straightforward, it exists within a complex web of protections and exceptions, ensuring that beneath the surface of at-will employment, certain rights remain firmly guarded.
Massachusetts is one of the many states that follows the at-will employment doctrine. Under this principle, both employers and employees have the freedom to terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause, and without prior notice. This flexibility means that, in most cases, an employer does not need to provide a reason to fire an employee, nor does an employee need to give a reason to resign.
However, like other states that follow this doctrine, there are important legal exceptions to at-will employment in Massachusetts. Employers cannot terminate employees for reasons that are illegal, such as discrimination or retaliation. Massachusetts state laws, as well as federal laws, protect workers from being fired based on characteristics such as race, religion, gender, age, disability or national origin. The state also protects employees from retaliation for reporting workplace violations, including harassment, discrimination or unsafe working conditions. Employees who raise concerns about illegal activities in the workplace or refuse to participate in them are also protected under public policy exceptions.
Massachusetts also recognizes the concept of implied contracts, which can override the at-will status. For instance, if an employer makes specific promises of job security or sets out disciplinary procedures in an employee handbook that imply a process for termination, the employer may be required to follow those procedures before firing an employee. Even if there is no written contract, courts may interpret employer policies or verbal assurances as creating an implied agreement. In addition to state and federal protections, Massachusetts employees who belong to unions or are covered by collective bargaining agreements may have additional job security beyond the at-will standard.
While at-will employment provides flexibility, it is essential for both employees and employers to understand that this freedom is not unlimited. Violating the exceptions to the at-will doctrine can result in legal consequences, ensuring that employees still have significant protections under the law in Massachusetts.
Liquidated Damages Cannot Penalize
by Sean Cullen, Esq.
A liquidated damage provision can be an effective contractual tool to predetermine the amount of damages a party must pay if there is a breach of the contract. Liquidated damage provisions are intended to provide parties with certainty of result by allowing them to agree in advance to a sum certain. That sum is intended to be a reasonable estimate of potential damage in the event of a breach. As illustrated by a recent Massachusetts Appeals Court decision, however, a liquidated damage provision that serves as a penalty for a breach of the contract, rather than a reasonable estimate of potential damage, will not be enforced.
The decision concerned a provision of a commercial lease that entitled the tenant to actual damages plus $500 for each day items identified on a punch list, such as HVAC maintenance and repair, remained uncompleted after thirty days. Liquidated damage provisions negotiated between sophisticated parties are presumptively valid, provided that: (1) actual damages are difficult to calculate at the time of contract formation; and (2) the agreed upon sum represents a reasonable estimate of potential damage in the event of a breach. As the Appeals Court noted, however, the provision of this lease was not a liquated damage provision at all. By awarding a sum above the tenant’s actual damages, this provision guaranteed that the liquidated damage calculation would exceed, and perhaps vastly exceed, the actual damage calculation. Rather than provide the parties with certainty of result by allowing them to agree to a sum certain based on a reasonable estimate of potential damages, this lease provision simply added a $500 daily fine to the tenant’s actual damage calculation. The Appeals Court determined that this lease provision was an unenforceable penalty and therefore limited the damages to the tenant’s actual damages.
Massachusetts Wage and Hour Regulations – A Primer
by Adam J. Shafran, Esq.
Massachusetts has established comprehensive regulations under 454 CMR 27.00 to clarify and expand upon the state’s wage laws. Below, we’ll explore key aspects of these standards to help employers and employees better understand their rights and responsibilities.
Minimum Wage and Overtime Provisions
Basic Minimum Wage
Employers must pay at least the basic minimum wage unless explicitly granted a waiver under specific legal conditions.
Tipped Employees
The total compensation for tipped employees, including the service rate and tips received, must equal or exceed the basic minimum wage. To comply, employers must:
- Notify employees in writing about tipping regulations and the service rate.
- Ensure employees retain all their tips, unless tips are distributed via a lawful tip-pooling arrangement.
- Pay employees the full minimum wage if the tipping conditions are not met.
Overtime Pay
Non-exempt employees are entitled to overtime pay at 1.5 times their regular hourly rate for any hours worked over 40 in a single week. For tipped employees, the overtime rate is calculated based on the basic minimum wage rather than the service rate.
Reporting Pay
Employees who report for scheduled work of three or more hours must receive at least three hours of pay at the minimum wage if they are sent home early.
On-call Time
Employers must compensate on-call time unless the employee can freely use the time for personal purposes while waiting to be called.
Travel Time
- Ordinary Commutes: Travel between home and work is not compensable.
- Employer-required Travel: Travel beyond ordinary commutes for work purposes is compensable and must be paid at the applicable rate.
Sleeping Time
For employees working shifts of 24 hours or more, meal and sleep periods may be excluded from compensable hours if these periods are pre-agreed in writing and remain uninterrupted.
Permissible Deductions
Employers are allowed to make deductions from an employee's wages only under specific conditions:
- Lodging: Employers may deduct lodging costs from wages, but only if the employee has voluntarily agreed in writing. The maximum allowable deduction is $35 per week for single occupancy. The lodging provided must meet safety and health standards as outlined by relevant regulations.
- Meals: Employers may deduct the cost of meals, up to $6.00 per day for three meals, provided the employee voluntarily accepts them. The meals must meet reasonable nutritional and quality standards.
- Other Authorized Deductions: Employers may deduct for items such as health insurance premiums, union dues, or retirement contributions, but only if the employee has explicitly authorized these deductions in writing.
Uniforms
If a uniform requires special cleaning or maintenance, the employer must either provide the cleaning services or reimburse the employee. Uniforms that are "wash and wear" do not require employer reimbursement.
Prohibited Deductions
Employers may not deduct fees or costs from employees’ wages unless explicitly permitted by law. Unauthorized deductions, including those for cash shortages, breakages, or customer theft, are strictly prohibited and may lead to legal penalties.
Notice and Recordkeeping
Employers are required to:
- Post notices in the workplace outlining minimum wage laws, in both English and any other language spoken by at least 5% of the workforce.
- Maintain detailed and accurate records of hours worked, wages paid, and deductions made for a minimum of three years.
- Provide employees with access to their employment records within 10 business days upon request.
Conclusion
Massachusetts is known for its detailed employee-friendly laws. The above are just a few examples. For comprehensive details, consult the full text of 454 CMR 27.00 or reach out to Rudolph Friedmann for further guidance.